Utah Valley
Men -
Women
2016
-
2017 -
2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
| Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
|---|
| 134 |
Tyson Lambert |
SR |
31:56 |
| 375 |
Kevin Lynch |
SO |
32:36 |
| 579 |
Anthony Ocegueda |
FR |
32:59 |
| 1,016 |
Geofrey Kemboi |
FR |
33:39 |
| 1,183 |
Joseph Christensen |
SR |
33:54 |
| 1,213 |
Logan Petty |
SR |
33:56 |
| 1,282 |
Lamek Keditukei |
FR |
34:02 |
| 1,361 |
Adrian Jones |
SO |
34:08 |
| 1,683 |
Brandon Edmondson |
JR |
34:36 |
|
| National Champion |
0.0% |
| Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
| Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
| Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
| Regional Champion |
0.0% |
| Top 5 in Regional |
0.0% |
| Top 10 in Regional |
69.6% |
| Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
| Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Tyson Lambert |
Kevin Lynch |
Anthony Ocegueda |
Geofrey Kemboi |
Joseph Christensen |
Logan Petty |
Lamek Keditukei |
Adrian Jones |
Brandon Edmondson |
|---|
| UCR Invitational |
09/16 |
878 |
31:44 |
32:17 |
32:50 |
33:39 |
|
33:22 |
|
34:21 |
|
| UNLV Invitational |
09/23 |
987 |
32:10 |
32:40 |
34:26 |
33:09 |
34:30 |
33:40 |
34:09 |
33:27 |
|
| Santa Clara Bronco Invitational |
10/14 |
915 |
32:13 |
32:30 |
32:16 |
33:37 |
|
34:11 |
|
34:13 |
33:51 |
| WAC Championship |
10/28 |
990 |
32:24 |
32:41 |
32:45 |
33:34 |
34:03 |
34:14 |
33:57 |
33:39 |
34:24 |
| Mountain Region Championships |
11/10 |
898 |
31:44 |
32:02 |
33:53 |
34:03 |
33:22 |
33:58 |
|
33:49 |
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
| NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
31.0 |
805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
| Region Championship |
100% |
10.3 |
325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.4 |
5.9 |
63.3 |
23.4 |
4.7 |
1.9 |
0.4 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
| NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
|---|
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
| Tyson Lambert |
24.6% |
93.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
| Kevin Lynch |
0.0% |
175.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Anthony Ocegueda |
0.0% |
238.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Geofrey Kemboi |
0.0% |
237.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Joseph Christensen |
0.0% |
240.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Logan Petty |
0.0% |
243.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Lamek Keditukei |
0.0% |
246.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
| Tyson Lambert |
30.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.4 |
1.8 |
2.3 |
2.3 |
3.0 |
3.3 |
4.0 |
3.2 |
| Kevin Lynch |
52.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Anthony Ocegueda |
64.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Geofrey Kemboi |
84.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Joseph Christensen |
91.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Logan Petty |
93.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Lamek Keditukei |
96.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
| Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
| 1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
| 1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
| 2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
| 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
| 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
| 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
| 7 |
0.1% |
100.0% |
| |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
7 |
| 8 |
0.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
8 |
| 9 |
5.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
9 |
| 10 |
63.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.3 |
|
|
10 |
| 11 |
23.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
11 |
| 12 |
4.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
12 |
| 13 |
1.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
13 |
| 14 |
0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
14 |
| 15 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
15 |
| 16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
| 17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
| 18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
| Total |
100% |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
| Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
| Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
| Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
| Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |
